:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(toy, be fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(doll, be fun)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(toy, be used to fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(doll, be fun)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(doll, be fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(toy, be fun)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(doll, be fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(toy, be used to fun)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(doll, be fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(film, be fun to watch)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(doll, be fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(toy, be fun)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(doll, be fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(toy, be used to fun)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
Remarkability from parent implausibility
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(toy, be fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(doll, be fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(doll, be fun)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(doll, be fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(doll, be fun)
Similarity expansion
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(doll, be fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(doll, be used to fun)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(doll, be fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(doll, be used to fun)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(doll, be fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(doll, be fun for girl)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(doll, be fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(doll, be fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(doll, be fun)
Typical implies Plausible
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(doll, be fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(doll, be fun)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(doll, be fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(toy, be fun)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(doll, be fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(toy, be used to fun)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(doll, be fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(film, be fun to watch)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(doll, be fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(toy, be fun)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(doll, be fun)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(toy, be used to fun)