fox: have two tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have two tails 1.00
have long tails 0.94
have big tails 0.93
has physical part tails 0.89
have long bushy tails 0.82
have bushy tails 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fox, have two tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, have long tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fox, have two tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, have long tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(red fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(red fox, have big tails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(arctic fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have bushy tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(fox, have two tails)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(fox, has physical part tails)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big tails)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fox, have long tails)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fox, have long tails)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fox, have big tails)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(fox, have long tails)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(fox, have big tails)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fox, have long tails)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fox, have big tails)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fox, have bushy tails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fox, have long bushy tails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fox, have long bushy tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(fox, have bushy tails)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(fox, have long bushy tails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(fox, have long bushy tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fox, have two tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(red fox, have big tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, have long tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(fox, have two tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)