interpolation: is more accurate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.50
, process
Weight: 0.49
, function
Weight: 0.48
, topic
Weight: 0.47
Siblings spline
Weight: 0.49
, algorithm
Weight: 0.32
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.32
, compression
Weight: 0.31
, triangulation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more accurate 1.00
is accurate 0.98
be more accurate than extrapolation 0.88
is more efficient 0.79
is used more 0.76
is most effective 0.76
be better than extrapolation 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(method, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(interpolation, is more accurate)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(method, is accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(interpolation, is more accurate)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(interpolation, is more accurate)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(interpolation, is more accurate)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(method, is more accurate)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(method, is accurate)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(method, is used more)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(method, is most effective)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(method, is more accurate)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(method, is accurate)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(method, is most effective)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(compression, is more efficient)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(method, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(interpolation, is more accurate)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(method, is accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(interpolation, is more accurate)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(interpolation, is more accurate)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(interpolation, is more accurate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(compression, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(compression, is more efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(interpolation, is more accurate)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(interpolation, is accurate)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(interpolation, is accurate)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(interpolation, is accurate)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, is accurate)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(interpolation, be better than extrapolation)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(interpolation, be better than extrapolation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, be better than extrapolation)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(interpolation, be better than extrapolation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, is more accurate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(interpolation, is more accurate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(method, is more accurate)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(method, is accurate)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(method, is most effective)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(compression, is more efficient)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(method, is more accurate)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(method, is accurate)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(interpolation, is more accurate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(method, is most effective)