maine: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.67
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.61
, state
Weight: 0.57
Siblings vermont
Weight: 0.36
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.35
, las vegas
Weight: 0.34
, maryland
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
is red state 0.81
is best state 0.80
is poor state 0.79
was chosen as state capital 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(maine, has state state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(maine, has state state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(maine, has state state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(new hampshire, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(maine, has state state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new york, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is red state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(new york, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is red state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(vermont, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(maryland, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(vermont, is best state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is best state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(maine, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(maine, has state state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(maine, has state state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(new hampshire, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(maine, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(connecticut, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(connecticut, has state state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(maryland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(maryland, has state state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(vermont, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(vermont, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(maryland, is best state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(connecticut, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is best state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(vermont, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(vermont, is best state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(maine, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(maine, is poor state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(maine, was chosen as state capital)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(maine, is poor state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(maine, is poor state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(maine, is red state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(maine, is best state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(maine, is best state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(maine, is red state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(maine, was chosen as state capital)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(maine, is best state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(maine, was chosen as state capital)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(maine, was chosen as state capital)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(maine, is red state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(maine, is best state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(maine, is red state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(maine, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is red state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(connecticut, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(maryland, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(vermont, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(maryland, is best state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(connecticut, is best state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(vermont, is best state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is red state)