maine: is poor state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.67
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.61
, state
Weight: 0.57
Siblings vermont
Weight: 0.36
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.35
, las vegas
Weight: 0.34
, maryland
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is poor state 1.00
is poor 0.95
has state state 0.79
is best state 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(maine, is poor state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(maine, is poor state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(maine, is poor state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new york, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(new york, has state state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(vermont, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(maryland, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(vermont, is best state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is best state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(maine, is poor state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(maine, is poor state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(maine, is poor state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(connecticut, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(connecticut, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(maryland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(maryland, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(maryland, is best state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(connecticut, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is best state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(vermont, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(vermont, has state state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(vermont, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(vermont, is best state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(maine, is poor state)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(maine, is poor)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(maine, has state state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(maine, is poor)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(maine, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(maine, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(maine, is poor)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(maine, is best state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(maine, is best state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(maine, is best state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(maine, is best state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(maine, is poor state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(connecticut, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(maryland, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(vermont, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(maryland, is best state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(connecticut, is best state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(vermont, is best state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(maine, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)