:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, be good)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pie, is great)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(apple pie, is best)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pie, is great)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dessert, is best)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pie, is great)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(apple pie, be good)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pie, is great)
...
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(apple pie, be good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dessert, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(apple pie, is best)
...
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, be good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, is best)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best)
...
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cheesecake, is best)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pie, is great)
Similarity expansion
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(pie, is awesome)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(pie, is amazing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pie, is amazing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pie, is awesome)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pie, was good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(pie, was good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pie, is awesome)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pie, is amazing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pie, was good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pie, is awesome)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pie, is amazing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
...
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pie, is great)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(apple pie, be good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(dessert, is best)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(apple pie, is best)
...
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(pie, is great)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(dessert, is best)
...