pie: was good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents apple pie
Weight: 0.75
, dish
Weight: 0.66
, dessert
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.57
, junk food
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.37
, meat pie
Weight: 0.37
, cheesecake
Weight: 0.36
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.36
, tiramisu
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was good 1.00
is good for 0.93
be good 0.92
feel good 0.84
has quality good 0.84
be good for us 0.84
is great 0.83
was thought of 0.82
be bad for people 0.81
has quality bad 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, be good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pie, was good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pie, was good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(apple pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pie, was good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pie, was good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pie, was good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pie, was good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pie, was good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(junk food, feel good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pie, was good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pie, was good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(apple pie, be good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pie, was good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dessert, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pie, was good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(apple pie, be good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(junk food, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for people)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(apple pie, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dish, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, be good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(junk food, feel good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, is good for)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cheesecake, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, be good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pie, was good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pie, was good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(apple pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pie, was good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pie, was good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pie, was good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pie, was good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pie, was good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(junk food, feel good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pie, was good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(apple pie, be good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pie, was good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pie, was good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dessert, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pie, was good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tiramisu, is good for)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, is good for)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cheesecake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cheesecake, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(pie, was good)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(pie, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pie, was thought of)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(pie, was thought of)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pie, is great)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pie, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pie, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pie, is great)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pie, was thought of)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pie, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pie, is great)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pie, is great)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pie, was thought of)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pie, was good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(apple pie, be good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(junk food, feel good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for people)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(apple pie, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tiramisu, is good for)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cheesecake, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(apple pie, be good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(junk food, feel good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(apple pie, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for people)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pie, was good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)