telephone: be more common than computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cellular telephone
Weight: 0.76
, telephone system
Weight: 0.66
, device
Weight: 0.61
, network
Weight: 0.61
, utility
Weight: 0.60
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.38
, cellphone
Weight: 0.35
, computer network
Weight: 0.34
, pager
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more common than computer 1.00
is computer 0.84
be important to computer system 0.83
be better than laptops 0.81
be connected to computer 0.81
use computers technology 0.80
be recognized on computer networks 0.77
be better than wireless 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, be important to computer system)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(telephone, be more common than computer)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(device, be connected to computer)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(telephone, be more common than computer)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(telephone, be more common than computer)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(network, be better than wireless)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(telephone, be more common than computer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(device, be connected to computer)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(network, be better than wireless)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(device, be important to computer system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(device, be connected to computer)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(network, be better than wireless)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is computer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, use computers technology)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, be important to computer system)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(telephone, be more common than computer)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(device, be connected to computer)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(telephone, be more common than computer)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(telephone, be more common than computer)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(network, be better than wireless)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(telephone, be more common than computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(mobile phone, is computer)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is computer)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(cellphone, use computers technology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(cellphone, use computers technology)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(telephone, be more common than computer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be more common than computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(telephone, be more common than computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(device, be connected to computer)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(device, be important to computer system)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(device, be recognized on computer networks)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(network, be better than wireless)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(cellphone, use computers technology)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is computer)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(device, be recognized on computer networks)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(network, be better than wireless)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(device, be connected to computer)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(telephone, be more common than computer)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(device, be important to computer system)