biology: be considered soft science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.67
, computer science
Weight: 0.62
, department
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
Siblings mathematics
Weight: 0.37
, ecology
Weight: 0.36
, physics
Weight: 0.36
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered soft science 1.00
be considered science 0.89
be considered life science 0.85
be called science 0.84
is science 0.84
is important science 0.83
is most important science 0.83
be related to science 0.82
be related to physical science 0.81
be important in field of science 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(biology, be considered soft science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(science, be called science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(biology, be considered soft science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(computer science, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(biology, be considered soft science)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(biology, be considered soft science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(science, be called science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be called science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is important science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(physics, be related to science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(physics, be considered science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(physics, be called science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(physics, is science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(computer science, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered soft science)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(science, be called science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered soft science)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered soft science)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered soft science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(physics, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(physics, be considered science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ecology, be considered science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(physics, be called science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(physics, be called science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(physics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(physics, is science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(meteorology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ecology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ecology, is science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(physics, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(physics, be related to science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related to science)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(meteorology, is important science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is important science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(biology, be considered soft science)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, be considered life science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, be called science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(biology, be considered science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered life science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, be called science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(biology, be considered life science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(biology, be called science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(biology, is science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(biology, is most important science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered life science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be called science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(biology, be related to physical science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(biology, be related to science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(biology, be related to science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(biology, be related to physical science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(biology, be related to science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(biology, is most important science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(biology, be related to physical science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(biology, is most important science)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(biology, is most important science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(biology, be considered soft science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(science, be called science)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(physics, be considered science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(physics, is science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(physics, be called science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecology, is science)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(physics, be related to science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(meteorology, is important science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(science, be called science)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(biology, be considered soft science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)