deflation: has quality worse

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, risk
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.50
, challenge
Weight: 0.46
Siblings bubble
Weight: 0.32
, inequality
Weight: 0.31
, bubble bath
Weight: 0.31
, hangover
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worse 1.00
has quality bad 0.87
has quality good 0.84
be worse for economy 0.84
be regarded worse 0.81
be regarded as worse 0.80
be worse than inflation 0.77
is bad tutor2u 0.76
be bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality worse)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality worse)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(risk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality worse)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(problem, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality worse)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(problem, be bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(challenge, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(problem, be bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(challenge, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hangover, has quality worse)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hangover, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bubble bath, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(bubble, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(deflation, has quality worse)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(risk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(deflation, has quality worse)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(deflation, has quality worse)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(problem, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(deflation, has quality worse)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(hangover, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(hangover, has quality worse)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(hangover, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hangover, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(bubble, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(bubble, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bubble bath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(bubble bath, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(deflation, has quality worse)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(deflation, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(deflation, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(deflation, be regarded as worse)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(deflation, be regarded as worse)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(deflation, be regarded worse)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(deflation, be bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(deflation, be regarded as worse)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be regarded worse)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be worse for economy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(deflation, be regarded worse)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be regarded as worse)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(deflation, is bad tutor2u)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be worse than inflation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(deflation, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(deflation, be regarded worse)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(deflation, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(deflation, be bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(deflation, be worse than inflation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(deflation, be worse for economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(deflation, is bad tutor2u)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(deflation, be worse for economy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(deflation, be worse for economy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(deflation, be worse than inflation)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(deflation, is bad tutor2u)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(deflation, be bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(deflation, be worse than inflation)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(deflation, is bad tutor2u)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality worse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(risk, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(problem, be bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(hangover, has quality worse)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hangover, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bubble, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bubble bath, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(risk, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(problem, be bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(deflation, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)