ghana: is developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nigeria
Weight: 0.66
, country
Weight: 0.57
, south africa
Weight: 0.57
, nation
Weight: 0.56
, europe
Weight: 0.55
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.35
, zambia
Weight: 0.35
, malta
Weight: 0.35
, latin america
Weight: 0.35
, spain
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is developed 1.00
is developed country 0.91
is less developed 0.90
is less developed country 0.85
is developing 0.84
is economic developed country 0.80
be considered developing country 0.78
is developing country 0.78
is less economic developed country 0.78
be as developing country 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(europe, is developed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ghana, is developed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(south africa, is developed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ghana, is developed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(europe, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ghana, is developed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(south africa, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ghana, is developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(south africa, is less developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(south africa, is developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(europe, is developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(europe, is developed country)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(europe, is developed)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(europe, is developed country)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developed country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is less developed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is developing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing country)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(europe, is developed)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(ghana, is developed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(south africa, is developed)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(ghana, is developed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(europe, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(ghana, is developed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(south africa, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(ghana, is developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(malta, is developed)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(malta, is developed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(latin america, is developed)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(latin america, is developed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(malta, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(malta, is developed country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(latin america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(latin america, is less developed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(zambia, is developing)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(zambia, is developing)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(ghana, is developed)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(ghana, is less developed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(ghana, is economic developed country)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ghana, is economic developed country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is economic developed country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(ghana, is less developed country)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ghana, is developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(europe, is developed country)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(europe, is developed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(malta, is developed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(malta, is developed country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(latin america, is developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(zambia, is developing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(latin america, is less developed)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(europe, is developed country)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(europe, is developed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ghana, is developed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)