japanese restaurant: be at california

Related concepts

Parents	restaurant Weight: 0.72 , bar Weight: 0.64 , japan Weight: 0.60 , thing Weight: 0.56 , everything Weight: 0.51
Siblings	italian restaurant Weight: 0.41 , chinese restaurant Weight: 0.41 , french restaurant Weight: 0.40 , indian restaurant Weight: 0.40 , mexican restaurant Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at california	1.00
be at southern california	0.92
be at michigan	0.80
be at texas	0.80
be at mexico	0.80
be at japan	0.78
be at seattle	0.77
be at chicago	0.76
be at india	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.15

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(bar, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at california)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(bar, be at michigan)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(bar, be at michigan)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at southern california)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at texas)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(bar, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at california)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at california)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at southern california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at southern california)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at seattle)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at texas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at texas)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Salient(japanese restaurant, be at california)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at japan)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.04

Salient(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(japanese restaurant, be at japan)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at japan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.04

Salient(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(bar, be at michigan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at california)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at southern california)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at texas)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at india)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at seattle)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(japanese restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(bar, be at michigan)