maryland: was was founded

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.65
, baltimore
Weight: 0.62
, school
Weight: 0.61
, washington
Weight: 0.58
Siblings delaware
Weight: 0.58
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, connecticut
Weight: 0.36
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was was founded 1.00
was founded 0.99
was formed 0.83
was established in 1634 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(new york, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(maryland, was was founded)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(maryland, was was founded)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(new york, was founded)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was founded)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, was founded)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was founded)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was formed)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(new york, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(maryland, was was founded)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(maryland, was was founded)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(massachusetts, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was founded)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(delaware, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(delaware, was founded)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(connecticut, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(philadelphia, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, was founded)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(delaware, was formed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(maryland, was was founded)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(maryland, was founded)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was founded)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(maryland, was founded)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(maryland, was founded)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(maryland, was formed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(maryland, was established in 1634)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(maryland, was formed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(maryland, was established in 1634)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(maryland, was established in 1634)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(maryland, was was founded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(delaware, was formed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was founded)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(delaware, was founded)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(connecticut, was founded)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(philadelphia, was founded)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(maryland, was was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)