pizzeria: be at new york

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents italian restaurant
Weight: 0.60
, restaurant
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.49
Siblings deli
Weight: 0.36
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.36
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at new york 1.00
be at new york city 0.97
be at chicago 0.75
be at boston 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be at new york)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be at new york)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be at new york)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(deli, be at new york)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(deli, be at new york city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pizzeria, be at new york)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pizzeria, be at new york)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pizzeria, be at new york)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(deli, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(deli, be at new york)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(deli, be at new york city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(deli, be at new york city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at new york)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(pizzeria, be at new york)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be at chicago)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(pizzeria, be at chicago)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(pizzeria, be at chicago)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be at new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at new york)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(deli, be at new york)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(deli, be at new york city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at boston)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pizzeria, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)