pizzeria: be at chicago

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents italian restaurant
Weight: 0.60
, restaurant
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.49
Siblings deli
Weight: 0.36
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.36
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at chicago 1.00
be at michigan 0.82
be at boston 0.81
be at florida 0.78
be at america 0.78
be at texas 0.77
be at new york 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be at chicago)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be at chicago)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at michigan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at florida)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(deli, be at new york)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at texas)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at america)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(pizzeria, be at chicago)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(pizzeria, be at chicago)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at america)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(deli, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(deli, be at new york)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(steakhouse, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be at michigan)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be at florida)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at new york)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(steakhouse, be at texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be at texas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(pizzeria, be at chicago)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(pizzeria, be at new york)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be at new york)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pizzeria, be at new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be at chicago)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be at michigan)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be at texas)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be at florida)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at america)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at new york)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(deli, be at new york)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at new york)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(pizzeria, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york)