portfolio: has quality resource

Related concepts

Parents	collection Weight: 0.58 , tool Weight: 0.57 , service Weight: 0.56 , solution Weight: 0.56
Siblings	internet service provider Weight: 0.31 , operating system Weight: 0.31 , leverage Weight: 0.31 , management Weight: 0.31 , service station Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality resource	1.00
is useful resource	0.88
is quality	0.81
has quality use	0.81
be called resource manager	0.81
has quality system	0.79
has quality good	0.79
has quality bad	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality resource)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality resource)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality resource)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(collection, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(collection, has quality bad)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(service, is quality)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(leverage, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(operating system, be called resource manager)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(leverage, has quality good)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(management, has quality system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(collection, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(management, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(management, has quality system)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(leverage, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(leverage, has quality good)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(operating system, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality good)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(leverage, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(leverage, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(operating system, be called resource manager) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(operating system, be called resource manager)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(portfolio, has quality resource)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is useful resource)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(portfolio, is quality)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality use)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(portfolio, is useful resource)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(portfolio, is quality)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(portfolio, is useful resource)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(portfolio, is quality)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(portfolio, is useful resource)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(portfolio, has quality use)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(portfolio, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality good)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(collection, has quality bad)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(service, is quality)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(management, has quality system)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(leverage, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(leverage, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(operating system, has quality good)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(operating system, be called resource manager)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(collection, has quality bad)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(service, is quality)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(portfolio, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)