portfolio: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents collection
Weight: 0.58
, tool
Weight: 0.57
, service
Weight: 0.56
, solution
Weight: 0.56
Siblings internet service provider
Weight: 0.31
, operating system
Weight: 0.31
, leverage
Weight: 0.31
, management
Weight: 0.31
, service station
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality good 0.91
has quality use 0.90
has quality bad 0.87
has quality system 0.86
has quality worth 0.83
has quality resource 0.81
has quality question 0.76
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(portfolio, is quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(portfolio, is quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(portfolio, is quality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(collection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(portfolio, is quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(portfolio, is quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(leverage, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality questions)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality question)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(leverage, has quality good)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(portfolio, is quality)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(portfolio, is quality)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(portfolio, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(collection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(portfolio, is quality)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(portfolio, is quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(management, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(management, has quality system)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(leverage, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(leverage, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(operating system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(leverage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(leverage, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(operating system, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality question)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(portfolio, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality use)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality resource)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(portfolio, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(collection, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(management, has quality system)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(leverage, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(leverage, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality questions)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality question)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(collection, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(portfolio, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)