portfolio: has quality use

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents collection
Weight: 0.58
, tool
Weight: 0.57
, service
Weight: 0.56
, solution
Weight: 0.56
Siblings internet service provider
Weight: 0.31
, operating system
Weight: 0.31
, leverage
Weight: 0.31
, management
Weight: 0.31
, service station
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality use 1.00
is quality 0.90
has quality good 0.88
has quality system 0.86
has quality bad 0.86
has quality worth 0.81
has quality resource 0.81
have have used 0.77
has quality questions 0.77
have concentration one solution has 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality use)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality use)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality use)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality use)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality use)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(solution, have concentration one solution has)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality use)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality use)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(tool, have have used)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(solution, have concentration one solution has)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, have have used)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(solution, have concentration one solution has)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(leverage, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality questions)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(leverage, has quality good)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(management, has quality system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tool, have have used)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(solution, have concentration one solution has)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(management, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(management, has quality system)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(leverage, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(leverage, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(leverage, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(leverage, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(operating system, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(portfolio, has quality use)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(portfolio, is quality)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(portfolio, is quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality resource)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(portfolio, is quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(portfolio, has quality resource)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(portfolio, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality use)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(tool, have have used)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(collection, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(solution, have concentration one solution has)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(management, has quality system)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(leverage, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(leverage, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality questions)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(tool, have have used)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(collection, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(solution, have concentration one solution has)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(portfolio, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)