abacus: has quality system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.50
, tool
Weight: 0.48
, calculator
Weight: 0.47
, mathematics
Weight: 0.44
, software
Weight: 0.43
Siblings pencil sharpener
Weight: 0.32
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.31
, debt instrument
Weight: 0.31
, xylophone
Weight: 0.31
, negotiable instrument
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality system 1.00
has quality good 0.84
has quality bad 0.82
needs quality product 0.80
is quality product 0.79
has quality plus 0.78
be important for computer systems 0.77
has quality worth 0.77
has quality definition 0.77
reduce quality 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(calculator, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(abacus, has quality system)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(abacus, has quality system)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(abacus, has quality system)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(calculator, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(abacus, has quality system)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(abacus, has quality system)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(abacus, has quality system)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(software, be important for computer systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(abacus, has quality system)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(software, needs quality product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(abacus, has quality system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(software, needs quality product)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(software, be important for computer systems)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(software, is quality product)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(calculator, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(calculator, has quality plus)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(instrument, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality plus)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(software, be important for computer systems)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(software, needs quality product)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pencil sharpener, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(calculator, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(abacus, has quality system)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(abacus, has quality system)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(abacus, has quality system)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(abacus, has quality system)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(calculator, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(abacus, has quality system)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(software, needs quality product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(abacus, has quality system)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(abacus, has quality system)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(software, be important for computer systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(abacus, has quality system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(debt instrument, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(negotiable instrument, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(debt instrument, has quality definition)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pencil sharpener, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pencil sharpener, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(abacus, has quality system)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(abacus, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(abacus, has quality definition)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(abacus, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(abacus, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(abacus, has quality definition)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(abacus, has quality definition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(abacus, has quality system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(software, needs quality product)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(software, be important for computer systems)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(software, is quality product)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(calculator, has quality plus)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(calculator, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(debt instrument, has quality definition)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(debt instrument, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(negotiable instrument, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pencil sharpener, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(software, needs quality product)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(software, be important for computer systems)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(software, is quality product)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(calculator, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(abacus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(calculator, has quality plus)