foam: is good insulater

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.56
, composition
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.55
, surface
Weight: 0.55
, filler
Weight: 0.52
Siblings latex
Weight: 0.60
, styrofoam
Weight: 0.58
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, silicone
Weight: 0.33
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good insulater 1.00
be good for modelling 0.96
is great 0.88
has quality good 0.87
has quality bad 0.83
is important for things 0.80
is strong 0.79
has quality better 0.79
has shape solid 0.79
be bad for environment 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(filler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(foam, is good insulater)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(filler, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(filler, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(silicone, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(silicone, is great)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is strong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is great)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(latex, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(filler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(foam, is good insulater)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(styrofoam, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is great)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(silicone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(silicone, is great)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(silicone, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(silicone, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(latex, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(latex, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(fiberglass, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is strong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(foam, is good insulater)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(foam, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(foam, be bad for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(foam, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(foam, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(foam, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(foam, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(foam, be bad for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(foam, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(foam, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(foam, be bad for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(foam, is good insulater)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(filler, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(silicone, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is great)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(silicone, is great)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(latex, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is strong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(styrofoam, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(styrofoam, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(foam, is good insulater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(filler, has quality bad)