integrity: be in workplace

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.71
, value
Weight: 0.68
, principle
Weight: 0.67
, trait
Weight: 0.65
, characteristic
Weight: 0.65
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.37
, honesty
Weight: 0.37
, transparency
Weight: 0.35
, dedication
Weight: 0.35
, trust
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in workplace 1.00
be important in workplace 0.97
be in workplace important 0.97
matter in workplace 0.94
be developed in workplace 0.92
be important to employers 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(integrity, be in workplace)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(value, matter in workplace)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fairness, be important in workplace)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be in workplace important)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trust, be developed in workplace)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(trust, be important in workplace)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be important in workplace)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(integrity, be in workplace)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(trust, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(trust, be important in workplace)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(fairness, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(fairness, be important in workplace)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(dedication, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(dedication, be important in workplace)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(honesty, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(honesty, be important in workplace)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(honesty, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(honesty, be in workplace important)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(integrity, be in workplace)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace important)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(integrity, be in workplace important)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(integrity, be in workplace important)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(integrity, be in workplace important)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be important in workplace)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(integrity, be in workplace)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(value, matter in workplace)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fairness, be important in workplace)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(trust, be important in workplace)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(dedication, be important in workplace)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(honesty, be important in workplace)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(honesty, be in workplace important)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(value, matter in workplace)