new hampshire: has state first

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.75
, new york
Weight: 0.73
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.64
, maine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.65
, manchester
Weight: 0.61
, mississippi
Weight: 0.57
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.56
, new york city
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state first 1.00
has state state 0.87
is best state 0.79
was important to nation 0.76
be last in education 0.76
was important to region in times 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(maine, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state first)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state first)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state first)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state first)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state first)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new york, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(maine, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(maine, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(new york, has state state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(maine, is best state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be last in education)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is best state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york city, has state state)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state first)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state first)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state first)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(maine, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state first)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state first)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new york city, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(new york city, has state state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new york city, was important to nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(new york city, was important to nation)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(alabama, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(alabama, is best state)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(new hampshire, has state first)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(new hampshire, has state state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state first)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(maine, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(maine, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new york city, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new york city, was important to nation)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(alabama, is best state)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(maine, has state state)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(new hampshire, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(maine, is best state)