pug: has state pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.71
, small dog
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, puppy
Weight: 0.63
, breed
Weight: 0.61
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.40
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.39
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.39
, dachshund
Weight: 0.39
, chihuahua
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pets 1.00
make pets 0.93
is good pets 0.93
has state pet 0.91
make good pets 0.90
act around pets 0.89
act around other pets 0.88
is good pet 0.85
act around other pets in cages 0.85
is dogs 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pug, has state pets)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make pets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pug, has state pets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pug, has state pets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pug, has state pets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pug, has state pets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has state pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, make pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has state pet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, make good pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, make pets)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pet)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, make good pets)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, has state pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(beagle, make good pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(beagle, make pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, make good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, make pets)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, is dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pug, has state pets)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make pets)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pug, has state pets)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pug, has state pets)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pug, has state pets)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pug, has state pets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(dachshund, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dachshund, has state pets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(beagle, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chihuahua, make pets)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(chihuahua, make pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(beagle, make pets)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(beagle, make pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dachshund, is good pets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chihuahua, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(chihuahua, make good pets)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(beagle, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(beagle, make good pets)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(labrador retriever, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, is dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(beagle, is dogs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(pug, has state pets)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(pug, make pets)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pug, make pets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(pug, is good pets)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(pug, make pets)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(pug, has state pet)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(pug, is dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pug, is good pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(pug, is dogs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pug, has state pet)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(pug, is dogs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(pug, is good pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(pug, is good pet)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(pug, has state pet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pug, is good pet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(pug, is good pet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pug, is good pets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pug, make pets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pet)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pug, is good pet)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pug, is dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pug, has state pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make pets)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pet)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make good pets)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, is dogs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(beagle, is dogs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(chihuahua, make pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(beagle, make pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(chihuahua, make good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dachshund, has state pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dachshund, is good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(beagle, make good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pets)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pet)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make pets)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make good pets)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(pug, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)