retriever: is good pet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.64
, breed
Weight: 0.63
, work
Weight: 0.42
, water
Weight: 0.37
, animal
Weight: 0.34
Siblings golden retriever
Weight: 0.78
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.41
, beagle
Weight: 0.37
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.37
, dachshund
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good pet 1.00
has state pet 0.94
is good pets 0.91
make good pets 0.89
make pets 0.86
is best dog 0.86
has state pets 0.85
is good dogs 0.85
is dog 0.85
is good family dogs 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(retriever, is good pet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(retriever, is good pet)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(retriever, is good pet)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(retriever, is good pet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has state pet)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, make good pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, make pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has state pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pet)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, make good pets)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, make pets)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, has state pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(beagle, make good pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(retriever, is good pet)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(retriever, is good pet)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(retriever, is good pet)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(retriever, is good pet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(golden retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, is good pet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beagle, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(golden retriever, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, has state pet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(beagle, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(golden retriever, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, is good pets)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(retriever, is good pet)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(retriever, has state pet)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(retriever, has state pet)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(retriever, is good pets)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(retriever, is good pets)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(retriever, is good pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pet)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make good pets)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make pets)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(dachshund, is dog)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(golden retriever, is dog)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(golden retriever, make pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(golden retriever, has state pet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(golden retriever, has state pets)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make good pets)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make pets)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(retriever, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)