diversity: be beneficial to workplace

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.66
, theme
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.34
, pluralism
Weight: 0.34
, openness
Weight: 0.34
, integrity
Weight: 0.33
, harmony
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be beneficial to workplace 1.00
be important in workplace 0.93
be in workplace important 0.93
be important for workplace 0.92
be good in workplace 0.91
be necessary in workplace 0.91
be essential to workplace 0.90
be essential in workplace 0.90
be to workplace 0.90
be in workplace 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace important)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fairness, be important in workplace)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be important in workplace)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(integrity, be in workplace)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(fairness, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(fairness, be important in workplace)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(integrity, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(integrity, be important in workplace)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(integrity, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(integrity, be in workplace important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(diversity, be essential in workplace)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(diversity, be good in workplace)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good in workplace)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(diversity, be in workplace)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be essential in workplace)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(diversity, be necessary in workplace)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(diversity, be essential to workplace)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(diversity, be essential in workplace)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be in workplace)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be essential to workplace)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(diversity, be good in workplace)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(diversity, be in workplace)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(diversity, be necessary in workplace)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be necessary in workplace)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(diversity, be to workplace)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(diversity, be in workplace important)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be to workplace)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(diversity, be essential to workplace)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(diversity, be important in workplace)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be important in workplace)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(diversity, be essential in workplace)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(diversity, be necessary in workplace)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(diversity, be in workplace)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(diversity, be essential to workplace)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be important for workplace)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(diversity, be important for workplace)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(diversity, be good in workplace)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be in workplace important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(diversity, be in workplace important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(diversity, be in workplace important)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(diversity, be to workplace)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(diversity, be important in workplace)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(diversity, be important in workplace)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(diversity, be to workplace)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(diversity, be important for workplace)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(diversity, be important for workplace)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(integrity, be in workplace)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fairness, be important in workplace)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(integrity, be in workplace important)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial to workplace)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(integrity, be important in workplace)