extinction: be considered major problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents catastrophe
Weight: 0.53
, concept
Weight: 0.52
, process
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.49
, topic
Weight: 0.49
Siblings overpopulation
Weight: 0.31
, starvation
Weight: 0.31
, evolution
Weight: 0.31
, global warming
Weight: 0.31
, speciation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered major problem 1.00
is major problem 0.96
is major problem now 0.95
be considered problem 0.92
is major concern now 0.88
is serious problem 0.87
is major concern 0.87
is major 0.86
is problem now 0.85
has state problem 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(global warming, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(starvation, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, is major) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(extinction, be considered major problem)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(extinction, be considered problem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(extinction, be considered problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(extinction, is problem now)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(extinction, is problem now)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(extinction, is problem now)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(extinction, is major problem now)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(extinction, has state problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(extinction, has state problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(extinction, has state problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(extinction, is major problem now)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(extinction, is major concern now)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is problem now)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(extinction, is major concern)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(extinction, is major concern now)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(extinction, is major)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major concern now)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(extinction, is major concern now)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(extinction, is major concern)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(extinction, is major)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major concern)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(extinction, is major)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(extinction, is major concern)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(extinction, be considered major problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(global warming, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major)