extinction: be considered problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents catastrophe
Weight: 0.53
, concept
Weight: 0.52
, process
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.49
, topic
Weight: 0.49
Siblings overpopulation
Weight: 0.31
, starvation
Weight: 0.31
, evolution
Weight: 0.31
, global warming
Weight: 0.31
, speciation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered problem 1.00
be considered major problem 0.92
is problem now 0.91
has state problem 0.88
is serious problem 0.87
is major problem 0.86
is major problem now 0.86
is concern now 0.79
is serious environmental problem 0.79
is environmental problem 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(global warming, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(global warming, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(starvation, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(extinction, be considered problem)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(extinction, is problem now)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(extinction, is problem now)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(extinction, is problem now)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(extinction, is environmental problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(extinction, has state problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is problem now)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(extinction, is environmental problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(extinction, has state problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is serious environmental problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(extinction, is concern now)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(extinction, is concern now)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(extinction, is environmental problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(extinction, is concern now)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(extinction, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(extinction, is serious environmental problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(extinction, is major problem now)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(extinction, is major problem now)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is concern now)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(extinction, is serious environmental problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(extinction, is serious environmental problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(extinction, be considered problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(global warming, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)