extinction: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents catastrophe
Weight: 0.53
, concept
Weight: 0.52
, process
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.49
, topic
Weight: 0.49
Siblings overpopulation
Weight: 0.31
, starvation
Weight: 0.31
, evolution
Weight: 0.31
, global warming
Weight: 0.31
, speciation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
is problem now 0.92
be considered problem 0.88
is major problem now 0.87
is major problem 0.87
is serious problem 0.86
be considered major problem 0.84
has state concern 0.84
is environmental problem 0.80
is serious environmental problem 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state concern)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(global warming, has state problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(starvation, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state concern)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(extinction, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(extinction, is problem now)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(extinction, is problem now)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(extinction, is problem now)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(extinction, be considered problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(extinction, is environmental problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(extinction, be considered problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(extinction, is environmental problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is problem now)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is serious environmental problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(extinction, is environmental problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(extinction, has state concern)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(extinction, has state concern)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(extinction, is major problem now)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(extinction, is major problem now)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(extinction, has state concern)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(extinction, is serious environmental problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state concern)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(extinction, is serious environmental problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(extinction, is serious environmental problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(extinction, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(global warming, has state problem)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state concern)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)