extinction: is serious environmental problem

Related concepts

Parents	catastrophe Weight: 0.53 , concept Weight: 0.52 , process Weight: 0.51 , problem Weight: 0.49 , topic Weight: 0.49
Siblings	overpopulation Weight: 0.31 , starvation Weight: 0.31 , evolution Weight: 0.31 , global warming Weight: 0.31 , speciation Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is serious environmental problem	1.00
is environmental problem	0.95
is serious problem	0.91
is serious	0.86
is major problem	0.83
be considered major problem	0.82
is major problem now	0.82
has state problem	0.79
be considered problem	0.79
is problem now	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(global warming, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(global warming, has state problem)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(starvation, has state problem)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(extinction, is serious environmental problem)

Similarity expansion

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(extinction, is environmental problem)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(extinction, is environmental problem)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.33

Salient(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(extinction, is environmental problem)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(extinction, is problem now)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(extinction, is problem now)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(extinction, be considered problem)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.33

Salient(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(extinction, be considered problem)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.33

Salient(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Salient(extinction, is problem now)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(extinction, has state problem)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(extinction, is major problem now)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(extinction, has state problem)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(extinction, be considered major problem)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.33

Salient(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(extinction, be considered major problem)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.33

Salient(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(extinction, has state problem)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.33

Salient(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(extinction, is major problem now)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is problem now)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.33

Salient(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is serious environmental problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(extinction, is serious environmental problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(overpopulation, is environmental problem)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(global warming, has state problem)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is serious environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)