massachusetts: were founded

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, new england
Weight: 0.65
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.63
, connecticut
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.64
, boston
Weight: 0.62
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, maryland
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
were founded 1.00
was founded 0.98
was formed 0.80
was established 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(massachusetts, were founded)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pennsylvania, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(massachusetts, were founded)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(new york, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(massachusetts, were founded)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new england, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(massachusetts, were founded)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(pennsylvania, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(massachusetts, were founded)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(massachusetts, were founded)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(pennsylvania, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(massachusetts, were founded)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(massachusetts, were founded)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(massachusetts, were founded)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(massachusetts, were founded)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(new england, was founded)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(new york, was founded)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was founded)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was established)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was established)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was established)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was founded)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was established)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new england, was founded)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was founded)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was formed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, was founded)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was founded)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(boston, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, was formed)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, were founded)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pennsylvania, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, were founded)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(new york, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, were founded)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new england, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, were founded)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(pennsylvania, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, were founded)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(pennsylvania, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, were founded)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, were founded)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, were founded)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, were founded)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, were founded)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(boston, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(boston, was founded)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(maryland, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(maryland, was founded)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(west virginia, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(west virginia, was founded)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new hampshire, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was formed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(maryland, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(maryland, was formed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(west virginia, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(west virginia, was formed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(new hampshire, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was established)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(massachusetts, were founded)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was founded)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was founded)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was founded)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was founded)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was formed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was established)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was established)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was established)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was established)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(massachusetts, were founded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was formed)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was founded)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(connecticut, was founded)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was established)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(connecticut, was established)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was formed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was established)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(west virginia, was formed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(boston, was founded)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(maryland, was founded)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(west virginia, was founded)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was formed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was founded)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(connecticut, was founded)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was established)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(massachusetts, were founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(connecticut, was established)