pennsylvania: was state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.59
, new york city
Weight: 0.59
, new england
Weight: 0.57
Siblings west virginia
Weight: 0.76
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.63
, indiana
Weight: 0.60
, ohio
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was 33rd state 1.00
was state 1.00
has state state 0.92
be called state 0.89
is commonwealth state 0.80
was important to nation 0.78
is best state 0.78
is poor state 0.78
was important to new nation 0.78
is quaker state 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(wisconsin, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(new york city, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(new york city, was important to nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was state)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new york, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(new york city, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(new york city, was important to new nation)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(new york city, was important to nation)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has state state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(new york, has state state)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york city, has state state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york city, was important to nation)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(wisconsin, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(new york city, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(new york city, was important to nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was state)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(connecticut, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(connecticut, has state state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(west virginia, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, was state)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was 33rd state)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is commonwealth state)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new york city, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(new york city, was important to new nation)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new york city, was important to nation)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(wisconsin, has state state)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(west virginia, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(connecticut, has state state)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new york city, has state state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(new york city, was important to new nation)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new york city, was important to nation)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(pennsylvania, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(wisconsin, has state state)
...